U.S. probe wants Tenet critic's aid

Senate panel to enlist a whistle-blower from Redding hospital.

By Sam Stanton -- Bee Staff Writer
Published
2:15 a.m. PDT Wednesday, September 10, 2003


The doctor who helped blow the whistle on alleged wrongdoing at
Redding Medical Center has been asked to cooperate with a U.S. Senate inquiry into the scandal and the $54 million settlement between the Justice Department and the hospital's parent company.

Dr. Patrick Campbell, an internal medicine specialist at the hospital since 1993 who is challenging the settlement, has been asked to meet with investigators for the Senate Finance Committee, which has launched its own probe into the hospital and its parent company, Tenet Healthcare Corp.

"Tenet appears to be a corporation that is ethically and morally bankrupt," Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote to Tenet's acting chief executive officer in a four-page letter announcing the investigation.

Grassley, the Finance Committee's chairman and a powerful advocate of whistle-blowers in the past, said in his letter that he is seeking Tenet documents going back to 1990, as well as all records of the $54 million settlement, including communications from the Justice Department, the FBI and other government agencies.

Tenet spokesman Steven Campanini said Tuesday the corporation is cooperating with the Grassley probe. The settlement between the Justice Department and Tenet was announced last month, with the hospital chain admitting no wrongdoing in connection with the Redding Medical Center case.

Administrators at the hospital are facing investigations into whether hundreds of unnecessary heart procedures were performed there to help boost the medical center's profits. While a federal grand jury in Sacramento is probing the case, no one has been charged to date.

Allegations from Campbell and others helped spur an FBI raid on the hospital last October, and prosecutors are seeking information on whether unnecessary heart procedures were paid for through Medicare and Medi-Cal funds.

Campbell's attorney has filed an objection to the government's settlement with Tenet, saying it is far too low and that a proper settlement could easily have exceeded $500 million.

Federal officials deny that, saying the settlement, which they claim is the highest ever reached against a single hospital in such a case, brought the government more money than it paid out for the procedures.

Campbell is one of two individuals who filed secret lawsuits last year seeking to be designated as whistle-blowers who tipped federal investigators to the alleged misdeeds. Generally, only the first person to file such a suit may be entitled to recoup up to 30 percent of any settlement the government later recovers.

Campbell's suit was dismissed Aug. 1 because he had filed it three days after the first suit, which was submitted by Redding-area priest John Corapi, who had been diagnosed at the medical center but later sought other medical opinions.

Corapi's suit is still pending and secret, although details of it have been disclosed previously in The Bee.

Campbell's attorney, David Rude, has asked a federal judge in Sacramento to hold a public hearing into how the settlement amount was reached. Federal prosecutors are expected to file their response opposing the hearing on Sept. 25.

In addition, Rude confirmed Tuesday that Campbell already has been contacted by Senate investigators about the probe by Grassley, who referred to Tenet in his letter as a company with a "sordid corporate history."

Grassley has asked Tenet for all records of communications between Campbell and Tenet administrators "that raise questions or concerns regarding Tenet's cardiac or related programs, including, but not limited to, the necessity for cardiac procedures and surgeries."

Campbell claims in his suit that he tried for years to get Redding Medical Center officials to listen to his concerns about unnecessary heart procedures being conducted at the hospital, but that he was ignored.

In his letter to Tenet, Grassley left no question of his displeasure that the Justice Department agreed to a settlement that did not require an admission of guilt.

"It is quite troubling that Tenet did not admit liability or any wrongdoing under the terms of this latest settlement with the government," Grassley wrote.